|
|
Post by Firecracker on Dec 21, 2002 11:34:50 GMT 10
I can't stand Alec Baldwin. His idea of whispering instead of talking is not attractive, nor effective! Speak up!
|
|
|
|
Post by dirtgirl on Jan 8, 2003 19:57:42 GMT 10
i'll second Ted Danson. boo
|
|
|
|
Post by fathershark on Feb 19, 2003 15:31:00 GMT 10
some new people that give me the shits have come to my attention:
War Mongering Politicians with small dicks
Rodney Rude (although he is potentially my soulmate)
Rob Sitch (you were funnier when you had hair motherf*cker)
That skinny bitch from Bachelor Girl
Colin Farrell
And, much to my suprise - after seeing "A Walk to Remember" on a motel video channel, I now have a thing for Mandy Moore.
|
|
|
|
Post by caelestis on Feb 19, 2003 16:48:37 GMT 10
That skinny bitch from Bachelor Girl i do believe her official title is "that skinny bitch from bachelor girl with the freakishly big head". |
|
|
|
Post by Tiberius on Feb 19, 2003 19:22:53 GMT 10
some new people that give me the shits have come to my attention: Rob Sitch (you were funnier when you had hair He's like Samson. His power is contained within his hair. |
|
|
|
Post by fathershark on Feb 20, 2003 7:42:00 GMT 10
i do believe her official title is "that skinny bitch from bachelor girl with the freakishly big head". Yes, I can imagine her coming out of Pokemon ball. Her special Pokemon power would be 24 hour projectile bullimia. DIE whorespawn of Pikachu. |
|
|
|
Post by timbaxterml on Apr 3, 2003 2:36:30 GMT 10
for those who are/were interested in hypercritical and don't already know. It has moved to its own domain. w00t! It's now located at: www.hypercritical.net/Feel free to submit. I'll put anything on the site that has substance. Drive_me_ |
|
|
|
Post by fathershark on Apr 3, 2003 10:01:00 GMT 10
I've written a review of some of the drug addict prostitutes I've paid for in the dark, damp alleyways in Potts Point - can I submit this?
|
|
|
|
Post by Tiberius on Apr 3, 2003 13:07:48 GMT 10
Woo, you got the domain Tim.
Okay, can I be "hypercritical" about the site design? (let me put last semester's design class to use....)
(1) On the first splash page, there's too much empty "white space" above the main graphic. You could probably fit all of the splash page above the fold so the viewer doesn't have to scroll here.
(2) "I wish I didn't have to say this but I suppose I do. Everything on this page (including all coding unless stated otherwise) belongs to the respective authors. if you want permission to use any of it, Email them and see if they're willing to help." - this is too wordy. Do a simple and to the point copyright notice like Something for Kate do on their website. For example,
"© 1996 - 2003 Something for Kate
This website has been optimised for viewing with Internet Explorer / Netscape V.4 or higher browsers at 800 x 600 screen resolution.
Copyright for all materials on this website are held by the respective authors, artists, & photographers. Materials may not be reproduced or otherwise distributed without written authorisation."
I'm not saying you should rip off their copyright notice, but it needs to be clearer like theirs is.
(3) Also on the splash page, the average user doesn't care if you built the site by hand or with dreamweaver. Put that information in the metacode but not as text on the front page.
(4) Your menu in the center of the screen is taking away screen retail space that could be better used for the site articles. Have you considered having the menu on the left hand side (à la sfk.com) or up the top of the screen (à la sfkforthenovice.com) ?
Anyway, good job. I'll submit write-ups for the site when I can, but probably not until this semester of tafe finishes as it's just flat out.
|
|
|
|
Post by timbaxterml on Apr 3, 2003 16:22:20 GMT 10
I've written a review of some of the drug addict prostitutes I've paid for in the dark, damp alleyways in Potts Point - can I submit this? I'd rather it wasn't a review of fictional people which this, undoubtedly, would be. So if that is the case no. If it's genuine. and the review is of a half-decent quality (ie. someone else might actually give a shit) then go for it. Drive_me_ |
|
|
|
Post by fathershark on Apr 5, 2003 21:30:46 GMT 10
okay, I've written a review on how the HTML used on your new website could have been coded by a lobotimised monkey with a nervous twitch and a demonically possessed left arse cheek.
submissions@hypercritical.net right?
|
|
