|
|
Post by fathershark on Feb 14, 2003 9:15:28 GMT 10
i'm a real red-head, damnit. you mean "dirty ginger" right? |
|
|
|
Post by Tiberius on Feb 14, 2003 14:27:37 GMT 10
Actually, I remember reading that the way to tell if someone is a "real redhead" is not to look at their pubic hair as Catfish implies but rather look at their eyebrows. The reason is that someone's public hair isn't always the same colour as the hair on his or her head but their eyebrow colour always is.
|
|
|
|
Post by Catfish on Feb 14, 2003 16:04:13 GMT 10
"shut uuuuuuuuuuup"
(as per lenny and carl on the simpsons trying to keep the stonecutters club a secret from homer)
|
|
|
|
Post by fathershark on Feb 14, 2003 16:19:35 GMT 10
I understand why women have pubic hair (it performs the same function as eyebrows and eyelashes), but can someone please explain to me why Men also have it?
|
|
|
|
Post by dirtgirl on Feb 14, 2003 16:33:19 GMT 10
I understand why women have pubic hair (it performs the same function as eyebrows and eyelashes), but can someone please explain to me why Men also have it? please explain  |
|
|
|
Post by fathershark on Feb 14, 2003 15:39:16 GMT 10
well, to put it in non-offensive common language, it stops bits of shit trawling up yer pipes.
|
|
|
|
Post by Catfish on Feb 16, 2003 11:16:36 GMT 10
well yas did a fine damn job of ruining my perfectly respectable thread didnt yas?
|
|
|
|
Post by fathershark on Feb 17, 2003 8:22:04 GMT 10
thanks for the compliment. Trashing the wholesome, unblemished innocence of a thread is not something that can be learnt, it is something that you are born into.
|
|
|
|
Post by dirtgirl on Feb 19, 2003 14:31:17 GMT 10
we tried hard. and we succeeded. ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Tiberius on Feb 19, 2003 19:35:44 GMT 10
I understand why women have pubic hair (it performs the same function as eyebrows and eyelashes), but can someone please explain to me why Men also have it? For the same reason women have it, that is, to keep warm I guess. But nipples on men, that's the bigger conundrum. |
|
|
|
Post by fathershark on Feb 20, 2003 7:38:07 GMT 10
It hasn't been speculated that it is a biological throw back (like the gall bladder and the appendix).
|
|
|
|
Post by Catfish on Feb 20, 2003 13:46:55 GMT 10
"Human nipples appear in the third or fourth week of development, well before the sex characteristics. (The sex hormones start to assert themselves at seven weeks.) As many as seven pairs of nipples are arranged along either side of a "milk line," a ridge of skin that runs from the upper chest to the navel.
Normally only one pair amounts to anything, but on about one baby in a hundred you can detect some vestige of the other ones, usually on the order of a freckle. There are cases of women who ended up with an extra breast, which made them freak show candidates not so many years ago. Luckily today the women can avail themselves of corrective surgery while the rest of us can watch Jenny Jones."
Since when does a women having a third breast make her a freak? Unless it's like... not in proportion...
|
|
|
|
Post by fathershark on Feb 20, 2003 14:17:19 GMT 10
Interesting. I've actually got a 3rd nipple. Seriously. I thought it was a birthmark for the first half of my life, but have come to realise what it actually is.
It sits about 3 cm below the left one, and it is hardly distinct, but apparantly it is a huge turn on.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tiberius on Feb 20, 2003 16:23:20 GMT 10
/me remembers that scene in Mall Rats...
|
|
|
|
Post by fathershark on Feb 20, 2003 18:58:06 GMT 10
erm, no - nothing like that. Sorry to bring it up!
|
|
