|
|
Post by Firecracker on Dec 16, 2002 10:09:39 GMT 10
yeah deane, give me some room to breathe!  I don't like chocolate much.  Anyway, I don't understand this thread. Do we say hi, thank you or congratulations to katy? I'll go with -Hi Katy! |
|
|
|
Post by Tiberius on Dec 16, 2002 10:54:10 GMT 10
I don't like chocolate much. Is that possible?  |
|
|
|
Post by fathershark on Dec 16, 2002 11:01:28 GMT 10
If I had cancer of the testicles, I doubt I would like chocolate much, let alone anything else.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tiberius on Dec 16, 2002 11:03:08 GMT 10
Okay, if yes, but somehow I'm thinking that's definately impossible in life's case.
|
|
|
|
Post by Firecracker on Dec 16, 2002 14:54:59 GMT 10
yes, mark. It is possible. Why is it so hard to believe?  a. Because it's chocoloate and everyone loves it? b. because I am female and supposed to love it? c. other? No testes for me! I would hate to have them there, dangling... how uncomfy. And yeah, if I had cancer of the anything I wouldn't like much either. Please let us all be cancer free, now and always.  |
|
|
|
Post by singingcirclesaway on Dec 16, 2002 16:32:26 GMT 10
so tits are comfortable? ha.
|
|
|
|
Post by TheAstronaut on Dec 16, 2002 16:34:54 GMT 10
isnt that what bras are for?
god....im being corrupted
|
|
|
|
Post by singingcirclesaway on Dec 16, 2002 16:45:53 GMT 10
well, if you can find them in your size.  and not even then are you comfortable as such. not really. things dig in and wonderful stuff. just, eh, 2 giant sacs of fat and other shit hanging off your chest. not fun. |
|
|
|
Post by Firecracker on Dec 16, 2002 16:59:37 GMT 10
I hate it when the wire starts coming out and ends up in your arm pit. |
|
|
|
Post by Tiberius on Dec 16, 2002 17:06:43 GMT 10
Testicals are bad design though. God/The Powers That Be/Fate was having a bad day when males were invented. Putting the things needed for procreation where they're in the way between the legs in a thin sack where they're vulnerable to injury doesn't seem so wise.
|
|
|
|
Post by TheAstronaut on Dec 16, 2002 17:10:10 GMT 10
maybe he created the 'private areas' to be centralised? because thats the way it seems...
|
|
|
|
Post by Tiberius on Dec 16, 2002 17:13:00 GMT 10
Well no I wasn't suggesting your testicals should be hanging off your chin (like in that episode of South Park a few weeks back) but wouldn't it make more sense if they were internal? (like women's ovaries)
|
|
|
|
Post by loux2 on Dec 16, 2002 18:11:49 GMT 10
boobs aren't that bad, in my case anyway
i can see why they'd get annoying though if they were big. hmm
and yes the testicals on the outside of the body does seems a weird place to put em
|
|
|
|
Post by Dazza on Dec 16, 2002 19:16:37 GMT 10
testes outside the body is for cooling purposes..........they produce less sperm at higher tempratures
|
|
|
|
Post by Tiberius on Dec 16, 2002 19:26:45 GMT 10
Yeah, I know that, but I still say it's bad design. Surely they could be internal and there could be some internal cooling mechanism?
|
|
and not even then are you comfortable as such. not really. things dig in and wonderful stuff. just, eh, 2 giant sacs of fat and other shit hanging off your chest. not fun.