a question for the morally imposed

[TheAstronaut]

heres one :

lets say i have a copy of intermission, but i lose my cover/disc [whichever one]. does this make the item less valuable? yes! now here is the question :

which is more valuable? the cover? or the cd? this is one of those yes/no questions.
why did i ask this?
i dunno
why am i here?
dont ask me
who am i?
no comment.


err....as you can see im currently bored. but still it was interesting to say that. without the cd, the object is obsolete in a way.

[luceluna]

the value of an item like a rare CD is in the authenticity and completeness of the set (i.e. cover and disc). no-one's gonna pay full-price for a burnt copy of Intermission, are they? even one that's been professionally reproduced. they might pay a smaller amount, but the item's true value comes from having a complete, original copy. put up on ebay seperately, though, i'm sure the disc would fetch a fair amount on it's own, while the art would attract no bids. funny how that works. so i'd have to say the disc is more valuable.

as for your other questions:

why did i ask this?
why not?
why am i here?
are you really 'here'?
who am i?
a bored person?

[singingcirclesaway]

i know the answer - youre a weiner if you lose either, and so you obviously didnt deserve to own a copy in the first place.

[luceluna]

lol @ sparky