|
|
Post by dirtgirl on Feb 5, 2002 22:29:50 GMT 10
The meaning of life? x n + y n = z n, for n greater than 2 or 42?  |
|
|
|
Post by singingcirclesaway on Feb 5, 2002 23:58:01 GMT 10
the meaning of life is to reproduce. end of story.  |
|
|
|
Post by Glen on Feb 6, 2002 1:22:27 GMT 10
That sounds just crazy enough to work!  |
|
|
|
Post by singingcirclesaway on Feb 6, 2002 14:26:07 GMT 10
crazy? nonono. just truth.  |
|
|
|
Post by spongeboy on Feb 6, 2002 14:45:22 GMT 10
pffffftzt....the answer is eeeasssy...its forty two, as Dirtgirl pointed out.
The problem is, what exactly is the question to the meaning of life?
Some options...
a how many roads must a man walk down?
b what is God's favourite number?
c what is seven times six?
i personally favour c, as we all know the answer to a is "blowing in the wind", and the answer to b is either 7 or 12 or 40 or 3 (or 666)
|
|
|
|
Post by dirtgirl on Feb 6, 2002 15:16:48 GMT 10
Aah, that explains your obsession with sex (especially with pd ). Another of God's numbers...69 |
|
|
|
Post by singingcirclesaway on Feb 7, 2002 0:01:42 GMT 10
im just doing gods work. ;D i mean, if he didnt want us to do it, why would he make it pleasurable? and why would he make it so painful when you kick a guy in the nuts? it makes sense. |
|
|
|
Post by dirtgirl on Feb 7, 2002 14:49:25 GMT 10
Heartspark: your appetite for sex is insatiable (sp?) What WON'T you do? (PS: is this nut kicking some sort of new chick sport, kinda like netball? ) Spongeboy: [glow=red,2,300]ESSERE[/glow]: why is there something rather than nothing? (this was going to be an erudite thread before it got hijacked ) |
|
|
|
Post by singingcirclesaway on Feb 7, 2002 19:41:29 GMT 10
well, so far the only thing i have refused has been anal. and lets not go there. please.
ooh, we could create our own sport called kick-balls. i want to start my own team. sounds fun. ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by dirtgirl on Feb 7, 2002 22:21:01 GMT 10
I can understand you giving THAT one a miss (I always politely decline as well ;D).
What are the rules to this new game? Do they involve answering the question: to be or not to be? (essere o non essere?)
|
|
|
|
Post by singingcirclesaway on Feb 7, 2002 22:58:27 GMT 10
understandably. no thanks buddy. |
|
|
|
Post by spongeboy on Feb 12, 2002 9:24:11 GMT 10
that game has already got a name - roshambow, but you have to be a guy to play it. Basically, i kick you in the nuts as hard as i can, then you kick me in the nuts as hard you can, and the last man standing win.... I remember my famous siloquoy about lead pencils - 2B or not 2B? Personally, i prefer HB. Why is there something rather than nothing? To confuse the hell out of us. There is a school of thought that as soon as one being in the universe discovers its purpose (even inadvertantly), then the whole universe will dissappear and be replaced by something even more complex. There is another school of thought that this has already happened. Any now, teleportation is theortically possible! ! ! ! ! ! pressroom.ups.com/pressreleases/0,1602,657,00.html Crazy days. |
|
|
|
Post by singingcirclesaway on Feb 12, 2002 12:26:48 GMT 10
yeah, i know of roshambow (thanks to south park) - but us girls want to play too. this game is like a spin-off of roshambo. or something. |
|
|
|
Post by dirtgirl on Feb 12, 2002 23:16:39 GMT 10
maybe we could play mixed roshambow ;D That would be heaps of fun (well maybe not for the boys...  ) is teleportation like new age astral travelling? |
|
)